Online dating services like Yahoo personals and eHarmony charge you a fee for using the service they provide, however, you can sign up and search and create profiles for free. When you want to hook up with a profile, you then have to pay to become a member. Is this not unlike being a pimp? A pimp provides the prostitute, you can look for free, but you have to pay to make contact. If the government allows paid online dating, then why not allow prostitution? Remember, the reason most people are looking to date is so that they can have sex. Even if you just want companionship with no sex, you still have to pay. Why the double standard? If you're going to allow online dating, then prostitution should be allowed. Your thoughts/answers please?
Should online dating services that charge you for using their services be considered legal Prostitution?
slash was a murderer, i leave in a village on the outskirts of Kyoto, when you kill a murderer you dont go to jail even in america, i was rewarded by the Yakuza{Japan's mafia} for killing him, and I was rewarded my the polices of Kyoto.
Reply:Prostitution is when one party to the intercourse is paying the other party. Unless a guy is paying the girl instead of the website, it is not prostitution.
Reply:Don't see any logic or value in mistaking one type of service for the other.
Reply:i doubt all are required to put out
Reply:Prostitutes are paid for sex acts. Are Yahoo and eHarmony charging for sex acts? If not, it's not prostitution.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment